| Home > | Quick links > | Library > | Help > |
| About us > | Contact us > | News > | |||||||||||
|
| Restructuring and forest design
The main upland forest areas of the region, including Kielder Forest Park, were originally planted with a single objective in mind: the creation of a strategic reserve of growing timber. Thus large areas of forest were planted over relatively short periods of time, creating even-aged plantations which are not well-suited to today’s multi-purpose objectives. The end of the first rotation has provided the opportunity to change what was created 40-50 years previously. If the forest structure is to change, then felling must not be simply a reaction to the attainment of economic maturity or the clearance of windblown stands, otherwise the result would be a perpetuation of the large, even-aged blocks of the first rotation. RestructuringIn the early 1980’s, it was realised at Kielder that a new approach was required which started with a long term view of the desired forest structure. The approach would seek to integrate the requirement of efficient operational activity with a planned increase in visual and wildlife diversity, by implementing a comprehensive forest management plan. The process - which aims to change today’s even-aged plantations into tomorrow’s diverse forests - has come to be known as restructuring and is given effect through forest design planning. The steps involved are:
Design plan areasA single forest or woodland, or a group of smaller woodlands in close proximity, constitute suitable design plan areas. Kielder Forest Park is too large to form a single design plan area and has been divided into a number of landscape units or forest design plan areas ranging in size from 1000 to 10 000 hectares. Areas were chosen to have a degree of landscape integrity for example, where valleys are separated by well defined ridges, the valley or water catchment is appropriate. In more rolling topography, the area between two main watercourses may be a more natural definition. In either case, there is a need to ensure that separate plans are integrated across plan boundaries. Plans also need to take account of management intentions, insofar as these can be ascertained, for adjacent woodland areas in other ownership. Plan areas should be as large as can be managed practicably to allow a weighting of objectives at an appropriate spatial scale. Too small a scale risks an excessively fine grained approach, with sub-optimisation of multiple outputs at forest level. Determining objectivesThe Forestry Commission follows a multipurpose management philosophy which integrates recreation, wood production, conservation and amenity. Its main aim is to create and maintain attractive and productive woodlands, to manage them for public benefits and to generate the required return on assets used. Different areas of woodland can contribute to this overall aim in different ways. Determining the objectives means describing the extent to which the particular area of woodland is expected to contribute to wood production, recreation, conservation, amenity and community involvement, and setting out the relative priority between different objectives. Objectives need to be kept under review as the design process unfolds lest previously unrecognised potential or constraints emerge. Basic survey and appraisalFor each design plan area a series of maps at 1:10 000, 1:20 000 or 1:25 000 is prepared showing the underlying landform, the current species and open space distribution, the predicted optimum felling date (age of optimal financial return) for each stand of trees and the location of environmental and recreational features such as watercourses, picnic sites, rights of way and sites of archaeological or nature conservation interest. Design plan conceptThe next stage is to produce a concept map for the design plan area. Different objectives carry different priorities in different parts of the design plan area. Thus recreation may be a priority objective on the lower ground or close to public roads. In other places, due to rarity or diversity, wildlife conservation may be priority. Usually, priority does not necessitate exclusivity, so for example timber production can still be accommodated in recreation areas. The concept map is a means of allocating weightings to multiple objectives in a spatially coherent manner. Felling plansThis plan identifies the location, shape and size of felling coupes where clear felling is the preferred system, and areas to be managed under a continuous cover regime (see “Managed Retentions” below). The plan also shows the five year period when each coupe will be felled. There are four principles involved in producing the felling plan.
A computer-aided design package is used to simulate the visual impact through time of the planned pattern of felling and replanting. A separate production forecasting package is used to test that timber production from the proposed plan is compatible with marketing commitments. Managed retentionsAs part of the design planning process, areas of the forest are identified as requiring management other than by normal clearfelling and restocking. These are areas of the forest which are relatively windfirm, and where the particular combination of management objectives can be best served by a regime other than clearfelling at financial rotation age. Such areas are identified on design plans as:
Restocking plansThe Design Plan shows the future distribution of tree species, along with the location and extent of open spaces. Major watercourses are identified as the focus for most of the planting of broadleaved trees. The standard procedure is to create wide riparian zones along major watercourses defined by the topography of the valley, with mainly native broadleaves interspersed with open space. Additional open space is built into the remainder of the forest in the form of deer glades and irregularly shaped perimeter rides around each compartment. Towards the upper margins, some areas of conifer forest are being replaced by open woodland, an irregular and clumpy distribution of broadleaved and some conifer trees, creating a transition zone between the forest and the moorland beyond. The choice of tree species at time of restocking is an important issue which affects the future productivity of the forest, the marketability of the produce, the visual impact of the forest and wildlife and amenity value. Following an appraisal of the options available on the site types found in Kielder Forest District, a species choice rationale has been drawn up with the aim of achieving the greatest productivity while meeting environmental objectives. ConsultationThe Forestry Commission is committed to entering into a dialogue with other interested parties to ensure that local authorities and relevant statutory and voluntary organisations can be aware of, and contribute to, the design plan process. This includes:
PresentationForest design plans normally consist of:
| ![]()
|
|||