|Description||This study provides a comprehensive survey of research and theory concerning the potential influences of environmental perception on health and well-being.|
|Methodology||The literature suggests that people generally prefer natural environments to urban environments and believe them to be natural and restorative (e.g. Kaplan, 1983; Walker and Dufield, 1983, Ulrich 1984). This distinction between the natural and urban environments is used by Parson's to re-examine the evolutionary theories of environmental aesthetics expounded by the Kaplans and Ulrich.|
|Published||Journal of Environmental Psychology 11: 1-23.|
|Price||Subscription c. £71 p.a. (4)|
|Keywords||environmental psychology; environment/stress; environment/behaviour; evolutionary theory/aesthetics; environment/preference; neuropsychology;|
A reading of Parson's work reveals potentially exciting avenues of future research. He reviews three areas of research to investigate the notion of 'an evolutionary driven, initial response to environments':
From his review of behavioural evidence he concludes that human emotional response is, in part at least, evolutionary driven. He refers to various research to show that affective responding is innate. This includes a number of studies with children and cross-cultural studies of the expression and experience of emotions. He refers to studies which reveal support for the preference for 'savannah-like' environments, (Balling and Falk (1982), Orians, (1980), Woodcock, (1984), and Orians and Heerwagen, (in press)
Parson's uses neuropsychological evidence to support suggestions by Zajonc (1980) and Ulrich (1983) that processing of incoming stimuli is initially affective, and that the initial affective reaction influences environmental preferences. From LeDoux (1986) he suggests that the initial response to environmental stimuli is extremely fast, based on little stimulus information, and because it is completely subcortial and centred on the amygdala, the processing is likely to be primarily affective (p12). The amygdala and hippocampus (parts of the limbic system of the brain important for emotional reactions and for comparison of novel and stored stimuli) may have the potential to provide a neuropsychological link between affective responses to environments, physical health, and the supposed restorative value of natural environments (p9) (Henry & Meehan, 1981; Henry, 1982).
Neuroendocrine and CNS immunomodulation.
Parson's refers to previous reviews of research on psychological responses to stressors (Henry 1980; Henry and Stephens, 1977; Henry and Meehan 1981) to discuss the range of responses to different types of stress. He cites evidence that subcortial, limbic brain structures are implicated in the processing of immediate affective responses to environments and that these are also important components of neuro-endocrine influences on immunocompetence (pp.16-17).
Balling, J.D. and Falk, J.H.(1982) Development of Visual Preference for Natural Environments Environment and Behaviour 14 (1) :5-28
Henry, J.P., (1980). "Present concepts of stress theory". In E. Usdin, R. Kvetnansky and I.J. Kopin, eds. Proceedings of the Second International Symposium on Catecholamines and Stress, Sept. 12-16, 1979, Smolenice Castle, Czechoslovakia. New York: Elsevier/North Holland.
Henry,J.P., (1982) The relation of social to biological processes in disease. Social Science and Medicine, 16: 369-380.
Henry, J.P., and Meehan, J.P. (1981). Psychosocial stimuli, physiological specifity, and cardiovascular disease. In H. Weiner, M. A. Hofer and A.J. Stunkard, eds., Brain, Behavior and Bodily Disease. New York: Raven Press.
Henry, J.P. and Stephens, P.M. (1977). Stress, Health and the Social Environment: A Sociobiologic Approach to Medicine. New York: Springer-Verlag.
Kaplan, R., (1983). "The role of nature in the urban context." In I Altman and J.F. Wohlwill, eds., Human Behaviour and the Environment: advances in theory and research, Vol. 6 pp. 127-161. New York: Plenum Press.
Kaplan, S., (1987). Aesthetics, affect and cognition: Environmental preferences from an evolutionary perspective. Environment and Behavior, 19: 3-32.
LeDoux, J.E. (1986). Sensory systems and emotions: a model of affective processing. Integer Psychiatry, 4: 237-248
Orians, G.H. (1980). "Habitat selection: General Theory and applications to human behaviour." pp. 86-94. In J.S. Lockard, ed., The evolution of human social behavior". New York: Elsivier.
Orians, G.H. and Heerwagen, J.H. (1992) "Evolved responses to landscape." pp. 111-123. In J. Barkow, L. Cosmides and J. Tooby (eds) Evolutionary Psychology and the Generation of Culture. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ulrich, R., (1981). Natural vs. urban scenes: some psychophysiological effects. Environment and Behavior, 13: 523-556.
Ulrich, R. S. (1983). "Aesthetic and affective response to natural environment". In I Altman and J.F. Wohlwill, eds., Behavior and the Natural Environment, New York: Plenum Press
Ulrich, R.S. (1984). View through a window may influence recovery from surgery. Science, 224, 420-421
Ulrich, R.S. (1986) Human Responses to vegetation and landscape. Landscape and Urban Planning, 13 (1) 29-44
Walker, S.E. and Duffield, B.S. (1983). Urban parks and open spaces: An Overview. Landscape Research, 8: 2-12.
Woodcock, D.M. (1984). A functionalist approach to landscape preference. Landscape Research, 9: 24-27.
Zajonc, R.B. (1980). Feeling and thinking: Preferences need no Inferences. American Psychologist, 35: 151-175.